Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Which is true regarding a buyer's right to waive warranties?


A) A buyer may not waive warranties.
B) A buyer may waive implied warranties but not express warranties.
C) A buyer may waive express warranties but not implied warranties.
D) A buyer may waive both express warranties and implied warranties.
E) A buyer may waive express warranties and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, but not the implied warranty of merchantability.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following are types of warranties?


A) Express
B) Implied
C) Acknowledged
D) Express, implied, and acknowledged
E) Express and implied, but not acknowledged

F) C) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under the UCC buyers and lessees may recover goods identified in the contract if the seller or lessor becomes insolvent within _____________ after receiving the first payment due under the agreement.


A) 5 days
B) 10 days
C) 15 days
D) 30 days
E) 60 days

F) None of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Stacy, located in Florida, is entering into a contract with Natasha, located in Russia, for the purchase of snow globes to sell to people who do not typically get to see snow. Stacy is familiar with the UCC but uneasy about what law would apply should she have a dispute with Natasha regarding the contract. She would like for Florida law to apply. Which of the following is the best advice to Stacy?


A) Stacy should attempt to have a contract clause inserted providing that the law of Florida would govern any dispute.
B) While a requirement that Florida law would govern the dispute would likely be deemed unconscionable, Stacy should attempt to have a contract clause inserted providing that international law would govern any dispute.
C) There is nothing that Stacy can do because Russian law, the law of the seller, would govern any dispute.
D) Stacy does not need to do anything because, as a matter of law, Florida law, the law of the buyer, would govern any dispute.
E) It depends on the value of the contract. If it is in an amount over $1,000, Stacy should attempt to obtain a provision in the clause that Florida law governs; otherwise, she has no option but to allow a court to later determine the conflicts issue.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Refused Furniture. Selina arranges to sell furniture from her furniture store to Roland for $3,000. Roland was supposed to give Selina a $500 deposit on February 1 and pay the remainder in monthly installments. Selina was to deliver the furniture by February 7. Roland did not pay Selina as promised on February 1. He asked her to wait until March 1, but she refused. She also refused to deliver the furniture. Selina was able to sell the furniture for only $2,500 because of a downturn in the economy. Roland told Selina that she had no right to withhold or sell his furniture and that he was suing. Selina incurred $100 in additional amounts in advertising costs to advertise the furniture that Roland initially purchased. Selina saved $40 in delivery costs because the subsequent purchaser picked up her own furniture. Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to withhold his furniture?


A) Roland is correct. Selina was required to deliver the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to withhold the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under the UCC, the seller must bring a lawsuit on a breached contract within _____________ years of when the breach occurred or when the seller became aware of it.


A) One
B) Two
C) Three
D) Four
E) Six

F) B) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

UCC Section ________________ requires good faith in the performance and enforcement of every contract.


A) 1-204
B) 2-205
C) 3-301
D) 3-302
E) None of these

F) B) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which option have most states adopted regarding the rights of third-party beneficiaries of warranties?


A) That seller's warranties extend to the buyer's household members and guests.
B) That seller's warranties extend to any reasonable and foreseeable user.
C) That seller's warranties extend to anyone injured by the good.
D) That seller's warranties do not extend beyond the buyer and the buyer's immediate family.
E) That seller's warranties do not extend beyond the buyer and the buyer's immediate family living in the same household.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If goods identified to a contract are destroyed before risk passes to the buyer, the seller must obtain substitute goods.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The UCC assumes that the seller has defective title unless the seller proves otherwise.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Hot Toaster. Rebecca bought a toaster from Super Store and brought it home. A friend of hers, Greg, was at her house making toast. The toaster malfunctioned and shocked Greg resulting in a small burn to his hand requiring medical attention. At a garage sale, Rebecca also purchased a blender from a friend, Samantha. When she paid for the blender, Rebecca said that it would be great for making smoothies. Samantha said nothing and just smiled while taking Rebecca's money. Unfortunately, the blender was not powerful enough to make smoothies. Which of the following rights, if any, does Greg have against Super Store in most states?


A) None because he did not buy the toaster.
B) None because he is not married to Rebecca.
C) None because he was not married to Rebecca nor was he a relative of Rebecca.
D) He may sue but only if Rebecca joins in the suit with him.
E) He may sue Super Store for his injuries.

F) A) and C)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Reference - Hot Toaster. Rebecca bought a toaster from Super Store and brought it home. A friend of hers, Greg, was at her house making toast. The toaster malfunctioned and shocked Greg resulting in a small burn to his hand requiring medical attention. At a garage sale, Rebecca also purchased a blender from a friend, Samantha. When she paid for the blender, Rebecca said that it would be great for making smoothies. Samantha said nothing and just smiled while taking Rebecca's money. Unfortunately, the blender was not powerful enough to make smoothies. Which of the following is true regarding whether Samantha made an express warranty to Rebecca that the blender would make smoothies?


A) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding problems with blender.
B) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding problems with the blender only if Rebecca can prove that Samantha knew about the problems.
C) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding problems with the blender only if Rebecca cannot prove that Samantha knew about the problems.
D) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding problems with the blender only if Samantha can prove that she did not know about the problems.
E) Samantha did not make an express warranty.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following are referred to as an implied warranty of quality?


A) Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
B) Implied warranty of merchantability.
C) Implied warranty of trade usage.
D) Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, implied warranty of merchantability, and the implied warranty of trade usage.
E) Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and the implied warranty of merchantability, but not the implied warranty of trade usage.

F) A) and B)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The UCC assumes that the seller has the right to transfer title free and clear of intellectual property rights of which the buyer does not have knowledge.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Because of the rule of privity, under the UCC warranties may not extend to third parties to a contract.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding whether a seller must provide a warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Act?


A) A seller must provide an express, full warranty.
B) A seller must provide an implied, full warranty.
C) A seller must provide at least an express, limited warranty.
D) A seller must provide at least an implied, limited warranty.
E) The act does not require that the seller provide any warranties.

F) B) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When does the UCC allow buyers and lessees to seek the remedy of specific performance?


A) Only when goods are unique
B) Only when a remedy at law is inadequate
C) Only when goods are worth more than $500
D) When goods are unique, when a remedy at law is inadequate, or when goods are worth more than $500
E) When goods are unique or when a remedy at law is inadequate, but not because the goods are worth more than $500

F) D) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

List the exceptions to title warranties.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The only exceptions to title warranties ...

View Answer

A buyer may revoke acceptance of nonconforming goods under any circumstances.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What do UCC sections 2-601 and 2A-509 indicate in reference to the perfect tender rule?


A) That if goods or tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer/lessee has the right to accept the goods, reject the entire shipment, or accept part and reject part.
B) That if goods or tender of delivery fail in any material respect to conform to the contract, the buyer/lessee has the right to accept the goods, reject the entire shipment, or accept part and reject part.
C) That if goods or tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer/lessee has the right to accept the goods or reject the entire shipment, but not the right to accept part and reject part.
D) That if goods or tender of delivery fail in any material respect to conform to the contract, the buyer/lessee has the right to accept the goods or reject the entire shipment, but not the right to accept part and reject part.
E) That if goods or tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer/lessee only has the right to accept the entire shipment and sue for damages.

F) B) and E)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 118

Related Exams

Show Answer