A) None because he did not buy the toaster.
B) None because he has no privity.
C) None because he was not married to Rebecca.
D) He may sue but only if Rebecca joins in the suit with him.
E) He likely has a right to sue.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not made as they should have been made.
C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not made as they should have been made.
E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
B) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
D) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability because even through bones are not a foreign substance to fish, they are not expected in small pieces of tuna fish.
E) That the plaintiff could not recover because no food has warranties attached to it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express warranties, implied warranties of quality, and acknowledged title warranties
B) Implied warranties, but not express warranties or acknowledged title warranties
C) Acknowledged title warranties, but not express warranties or implied warranties of quality
D) Acknowledged title warranties and express warranties, but not implied warranties of quality
E) Express warranties and implied warranties of quality, but not acknowledged title warranties
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability.
B) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
D) That the plaintiff could recover based on either breach of an express warranty or breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.
E) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because it was promised that the car would pull the boat.
B) No, because Sally was only engaged in puffing.
C) No, because only the manager can make such a warranty.
D) No, because Sally made only a warranty of merchantability, not a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) No, because no implications were made.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The seller must indicate whether that warranty is a full warranty or a limited warranty.
B) The seller must provide a full warranty and must indicate as such.
C) The seller must provide a warranty of merchantability, but no other warranties, and must indicate as such.
D) The seller must provide an implied warranty of trade usage, but no other warranties, and must indicate as such.
E) The seller must provide an implied warranty of trade usage and an implied warranty of merchantability, but not other warranties, and must indicate as such.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express warranties, implied warranties of quality, and acknowledged title warranties
B) Implied warranties of quality and express warranties, but not acknowledged title warranties
C) Acknowledged title warranties, but not express warranties or implied warranties of quality
D) Acknowledged title warranties and express warranties, but not implied warranties of quality
E) Express warranties and implied warranties of quality, but not acknowledged title warranties
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the plaintiff could recover from the manufacturer based upon the implied warranty of merchantability.
B) The court ruled that the plaintiff could recover from the manufacturer based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) The court ruled that the plaintiff could recover from the manufacturer based upon the theory of express warranty.
D) The court ruled that the plaintiff could recover from the manufacturer based upon the implied warranty of trade usage.
E) The court ruled that the plaintiff could not recover from the manufacturer.
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Because the salesclerk promised that there would be no problem with the cake, the bakery breached an express warranty and is liable for damages.
B) The bakery breached the warranty of merchantability and is liable for damages.
C) Because the salesclerk promised that the cake would make the birthday girl feel great, the bakery breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and is liable for damages.
D) Because food was involved, no warranties were made.
E) Because Brent failed to inspect the cake, he waived implied and express warranties.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted by FIFRA.
B) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was not preempted by FIFRA.
C) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought money damages as opposed to equitable relief.
D) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought equitable relief as opposed to money damages.
E) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only because it was not filed in a timely manner.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Agreement
B) Confirmation
C) Promise estopped
D) Pledge
E) Acknowledgment
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An express warranty
B) An implied warranty of merchantability
C) An implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
D) An acknowledged warranty
E) A warranty of trade usage
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The buyer and seller may not negotiate a shorter time for the statute of limitations than that allowed by the UCC.
B) The buyer and seller may negotiate a shorter time for the statute of limitations than that allowed by the UCC without any limits.
C) The buyer and seller may negotiate a shorter time for the statute of limitations than that allowed by the UCC so long as the time period is not less than one year.
D) The buyer and seller may negotiate a shorter time for the statute of limitations than that allowed by the UCC so long as the time period is not less than six months.
E) The buyer and seller may negotiate a shorter time for the statute of limitations than that allowed by the UCC so long as the time period is not less than two years.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It applies in every case in which an express warranty is found.
B) It applies in every case in which an implied warranty of merchantability is found.
C) It is a common law doctrine not followed by the UCC which recognizes only the implied warranty of merchantability.
D) It applies in every sales transaction involving a merchant.
E) It may be applied to sellers who are not merchants.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express warranty
B) Implied warranty
C) Acknowledged warranty
D) Claimed warranty
E) Consequential warranty
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 65
Related Exams