Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

The test used to establish one's mental state when insanity is claimed is the same regardless of the jurisdiction involved.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Embezzlement is distinguished from larceny because in embezzlement the individual does not take the property from another and is already in possession of the property.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following requires a "pattern"?


A) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
B) The False Claims Act.
C) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
D) The crime of false pretenses.
E) The crime of false token.

F) A) and B)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

List the elements necessary to establish bribery of a public official.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In order to establish bribery of a publi...

View Answer

Which of the following was passed largely in response to business scandals of the early 2000's, such as those implicated by Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, and Arthur Anderson?


A) RICO.
B) The False Claims Act.
C) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
D) The Medicare Recovery Act.
E) The Healthcare Fraud Act.

F) D) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is the secretive and wrongful taking and carrying away of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner of its use or possession?


A) Robbery
B) White-collar burglary
C) Larceny
D) Arson
E) Criminal fraud

F) All of the above
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following Supreme Court cases established the right to counsel before questioning by the police?


A) Whaley v. Reeves
B) Glover v. Smith
C) U.S. v. Glover
D) U.S. v. Parks
E) Miranda v. Arizona

F) B) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Ordinarily, to obtain an arrest warrant, a law enforcement agent must demonstrate that there is ________ that a suspect committed or is planning to commit a crime.


A) Likely cause
B) Suspected cause
C) Certainty
D) Probable cause
E) Information

F) C) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A defendant who argues that commission of a crime was necessary to prevent a more severe crime from occurring is relying upon the defense of _______.


A) Entrapment
B) Necessity
C) Justifiable use of force
D) Duress
E) Inescapable action

F) All of the above
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The primary purpose of criminal law is to compensate a victim.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The majority of the U.S. Supreme Court Berghuis v. Thompkins ruled that absent an explicit invocation of the right to remain silent, police may continue to interrogate a suspect, and what the suspect says may be used against him in court.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following was the result in U.S. v. Ruiz, the case in the text involving the defending deputy superintendent of New Mexico's insurance division who was convicted of offenses including mail fraud after he told insurers that they could avoid paying the fines for violation of licensing requirements if they contributed to certain charities?


A) That although the defendant violated certain laws, he did not violate the mail fraud statute because he did not himself mail fraudulent solicitations which is required for the offense of mail fraud.
B) That although the defendant used the mail to provide the illegal option to insurers, that in and of itself was insufficient to establish mail fraud.
C) That because the defendant used the mail to provide the illegal option to insurers, that in and of itself was sufficient to establish mail fraud.
D) That proof that the defendant directed that donations be made directly to charities established the reasonably foreseeable result that the mail would be used which was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
E) That proof that the defendant directed that donations be made directly to charities established the reasonably foreseeable result that the mail would be used but that such foreseeability was insufficient to support his conviction.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following occurs when someone unlawfully enters a building with the intent to commit a felony?


A) Robbery
B) Burglary
C) Larceny
D) Arson
E) Criminal fraud

F) C) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain the type of conduct generally referenced by the term "criminal fraud" and list the three elements generally involved in establishing criminal fraud.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Criminal fraud encompasses a variety of ...

View Answer

Which of the following is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or death?


A) Misdemeanor.
B) Felony.
C) Petty offenses.
D) Tort offenses.
E) Any business related crime.

F) None of the above
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Divorce fallout." Dr. Fred, following a messy divorce, has encountered significant financial difficulties. Dr. Fred has a friend named Slick Slim who tells Dr. Fred that he has been making lots of money by selling people a wristband that allegedly places pressure on a nerve that signals hunger resulting in a lack of appetite. Slick Slim tells Dr. Fred that, although the device does not really work, people who want to lose weight and look good in their bathing suits will do anything. Slick says the wristband sells like hotcakes. Slick also tells Dr. Fred that he will pay Dr. Fred five dollars for every band that Dr. Fred can sell to his patients. Dr. Fred proceeds to mail letters to patients suggesting the use of the band for weight loss. He also uses UPS to mail samples of the band to some patients along with letters encouraging purchase of the bands. Dr. Fred then proceeds to bill Medicare for office consultations he has with patients when they come in to purchase the bands. The scheme is wildly successful. Dr. Fred is able to entirely satisfy his alimony obligations within just a few months. Unfortunately, as patients begin to see that they are not having any weight loss, he has been receiving numerous complaints, and a friend of his told him that he could even be facing some criminal prosecution. -By which of the following acts, if any, did Dr. Fred commit health care fraud?


A) Dr. Fred did not commit any acts of healthcare fraud.
B) By the submission of false claims to Medicare only.
C) By the receipt of kick-backs from Slick Slim only.
D) By the submission of false claims to Medicare and also by the receipt of kick-backs from Slick Slim.
E) By submitting false claims to Medicare, by receiving kick-backs from Slick Slim, and also by merely listening to what Slick Slim had to say.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following occurs when a defendant makes a first appearance?


A) A magistrate determines whether there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt for the arrest.
B) A magistrate determines whether there was probable cause for the arrest.
C) A magistrate determines whether the defendant was properly booked but not whether the defendant was properly arraigned.
D) A magistrate determines whether the defendant was properly arraigned but not whether the defendant was properly booked.
E) A magistrate determines whether the defendant was properly booked and also whether the defendant was properly arraigned.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following are minor offenses usually punishable by a jail sentence of less than six months or a small fine with an example being violation of a building code?


A) Insignificant offenses.
B) Felonies.
C) Petty offenses.
D) Tort offenses.
E) Any business related crime.

F) A) and C)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Penny, who is the president of XYZ Corporation, tells Andy that buying stock in XYZ Corporation right now is a good idea. Andy is only casually acquainted with Penny and did not know that she was an officer of the corporation. He, however, acting on her information investigated the company somewhat and proceeded to buy some stock. Both Penny and Andy were charged with insider trading. Both Penny and Andy say that they did not know that insider trading was against the law. Also, Andy says that he did not even know that Penny was an officer of XYZ Corporation and that he thought the information at issue was public information. Provide the legal definitions for the defenses asserted and discuss whether they are adequate.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

By claiming that they did not know that ...

View Answer

Showing 61 - 79 of 79

Related Exams

Show Answer